Archive for the ‘X’ Category

Mon dieu! My god! Why ????

Watched this sequel with my mom, who really enjoyed the first movie and was interested in what happens next to the catholic French family whose four daughters have each married interculturally.

There’s NO use watching this ‘comedy’ if you haven’t seen the first one. And there is NO use watching this ‘comedy’ if you want to laugh at all.

The set up is kind of okay. Once all four daughters got married, the parents decide to visit the countries of each of their sons-in-laws. Now, this would have been a fun movie maybe. But no, they return after 5 minutes in the movie and learn that each of their kids want to leave France! So, they want to make sure they can convince their kids of staying in their beloved country.

It’s simplistic patriotic bullshit. Sugarcoated as being tolerant towards other cultures. Irony and Sarcasm just aren’t a French thing. And, just like in the first movie, every jokes is EXPLAINED! How unfunny is that????????

The title says: whatever did we do (again) to God (to deserve this)…. exactly.

The first movie made 150 million euro worldwide. (without a release in the US!)  This one made 70 million or so. Like my mom says: they can continue making movies of this family.

My God! Mon Dieu!

www.imdb.com/title/tt6556670

This movie takes its title from a funny book on the curiosities of the Dutch language. The main character is an editor for a superficial women’s magazine who is obsessed with language and would love to write a book about it and constantly makes remarks on certain things people say that don’t really make sense linguistically.

But that’s the only link between the book and the movie.

It’s also a movie about a single woman who seems to be the only one in her family accepting the fact that her dad, a bookstore owner, is suffering from dementia. She has the perfect possible boyfriend sitting in front of her in the editorial office, but he’s just a ‘friend’ and when she gets the change to work with a hot photographer, she goes for that adventure.

It’s a kind of Dutch Bridget Jones with lots of linguistic references and it sucks. And ironically enough, the pronunciation of the language spoken is SO terrible that the title (originally: Language, as we speak, is a bit my thing) should be called Uitspraak Is Helemaal Niet Zo Mijn Ding (Pronunciation is definitely not my thing at all).

To skip. Especially if you don’t understand Dutch. But nice images of Amsterdam though.

www.imdb.com/title/tt6867650/

 

The Irishman – *

Posted: December 8, 2019 in 2019, biopic, Gangster Movie, USA, X

Wow. Glad to not have bought a cinema ticket for this 3,5 hour Scorsese mob tale.

No, it’s not the best movie of the century. Maybe if this is your very first mobster movie you might be impressed. Not if you have seen dozens. It is not really terrible. It’s just too long. And nothing in the direction feels like it’s been done by a master genius. Martin Scorsese disappoints. And so does Robert De Niro. And what’s with the ‘special effects’ making the actors look younger? It’s silly. So are many discussion and many scenes that add nothing to the story.

The acting is not good (apart from Joe Pesci maybe, even though he doesn’t actually do much) and the story isn’t really exciting. None of the characters are sympathetic. And there’s no suspense. The main character works his way up to being some kind of bodyguard for the most notorious union leader of the US, who mysteriously disappears. One google search reveals what happened. Especially if you read about what book this movie is based on.

Maybe. Tonight just wasn’t the right time to watch a mob movie with aging actors.

www.imdb.com/title/tt1302006

 

A Rainy Day In New York – *

Posted: November 30, 2019 in 2019, romcom, USA, X

Random pick at the movie theatre. Woody Allen + Timothy Chalamet + New York… sounds like an interesting combination on paper.

But it doesn’t work. New York isn’t particularly exciting in the rain. Chalamet isn’t particularly impressive this time. And the voice overs and dialogues, written by Woody Allen, aren’t particularly funny this time around.

No. It’s a drag.

But Elle Fanning surprises. And her character saves the movie. An Arizona blonde studying upstate New York visits Manhattan for the first time with her boyfriend to interview a movie director. What’s supposed to be a one hour interview turns into an adventurous afternoon for her, whereas the boyfriend’s plans to impress his girl with a tour of the city get washed out.

www.imdb.com/title/tt7139936

 

Temblores – *

Posted: November 15, 2019 in 2019, Drama, Guatemala, LGBT themed, Luxemburg, X

Pablo has left his wife and kids to be with a guy. His family wants him to start with a gay conversion therapy. Which he does. The end.

It’s set in Guatemala, made with Luxemburg money and it’s boring. There’s zero chemistry between the two men. And the whole conversion therapy feels more ridiculous than intriguing/realistic.

Next!

www.imdb.com/title/tt7128732/

Tell Me Who I Am – *

Posted: November 4, 2019 in 2019, Documentary, UK, X

There’s this wave of documentaries that are terrible to watch and they all work on the same principle. The ‘documentary’ makers first interview a few characters and then look for images that support the stories that are told in the interview. It’s a terrible way of making documentaries.

In this one, a pair of identical twins get interviewed about two extraordinary events in their lives. The first one is quite impressive: one of them loses his entire memory after waking up from a terrible motorcycle accident and has to rely on his twin brother to fill him in about his life as he’s the only one he trusts. The second event is more of a moral issue. The twin brother has not told him the entire truth and has filtered out all the bad memories for decades. Even when evidence of a bad event in the past surfaces, the twin brother is still not willing to talk about it. Out of self protection as well.

So, this is a great base for an interesting article in a psychology/philosophy magazine. Is the twin brother helping his amnesiac brother by only giving him the good memories? Or should he be as honest as possible even though it may cause disarray? Lots of questions arise. And one of them is very obvious: why do these two brothers, who have been struggling with this issue for years (if not decades), finally want to discuss it in the presence of a camera team? Why?

This is not a good documentary. Not sure why people recommend it. There’s nothing audiovisual about this story at all.

www.imdb.com/title/tt10915286

As a Tarantino fan, I always wondered why I hated Kill Bill: Volume 1 so much and why I never bothered watching Kill Bill: Volume 2. 

15 years later it’s clear why: these are just pretentious, badly edited, poorly acted, faux-hommage action flicks with hardly any humor and – more surprisingly – hardly any cool fight scenes! At least those should have been wel choreographed, but no.

At least, I finished Volume 2 this time. Which is an achievement on its own.

www.imdb.com/title/tt0266697

www.imdb.com/title/tt0378194